Trinity Campus Culture Encourages Intolerance
Beirut and black-face indicate problems
Prof. Vijay Prashad
Issue date: 11/14/06 Section: Opinions
Campus culture has at least three interlocking circles. The first, the one with which I am most familiar, is the culture of the classroom. Dominated by faculty, classroom culture is governed by the curriculum and the faculty's relationship to changes in the various disciplines of knowledge.
The second is the culture of the College, the rituals, ceremonies, and traditions that one meets at matriculation, at graduation, at dinners with the President and so on. The College's history of liberal arts education defines this cultural world.
The third circle is yours, dear students: it is your social life, where the faculty is largely absent and the administration, while holding a regulatory role, treads gently. I've been at Trinity for over 10 years, and not a year has gone by when I have not heard the horror stories of homophobia, racism, and grave, grave misogyny in the fabric of student social life. Perhaps it is rumor, perhaps paranoia, perhaps the resentful murmurings of those who do not fit into the cool scene. Whatever.
Last week, I saw a series of pictures from a campus Halloween party thrown by a fraternity. Here, white male students wore black-face and red-face -- playing stereotypes of socially suppressed communities. I hear of a game called Beirut, where students line up to kill Arabs/Muslims with ping-pong balls as a prelude to being bombed by beer.
There are the routine stories of date rape drugs and of sexual harassment, and of derogatory comments toward gays and lesbians. Casual anti-Semitic statements are legion. The sheer confidence, even bravado, of these gestures requires a detailed sociological analysis. But, short of that, here's a thought: it is a truism of social science that on a social field when one entity is organized and others are disorganized, that one entity will bear disproportionate social power over the entire field.
Our campus social life has one set of entities that are organized and powerful. I mean, of course, the fraternities. The co-ed façade aside, the fraternities dominate social life despite the best intentions of the very weak cultural houses and of the new political groups (VOID, The Fred). Given the alumni support, both by check and by pressure on the Trustees, the fraternities operate with impunity. It is this unchecked social power, perhaps, that breeds a cultural arrogance among some of our students. It would be a mistake to see one student or another as the perpetuator of this or that incident. Rather, the social life of our campus is in grave need of social change and collective therapy.
The second is the culture of the College, the rituals, ceremonies, and traditions that one meets at matriculation, at graduation, at dinners with the President and so on. The College's history of liberal arts education defines this cultural world.
The third circle is yours, dear students: it is your social life, where the faculty is largely absent and the administration, while holding a regulatory role, treads gently. I've been at Trinity for over 10 years, and not a year has gone by when I have not heard the horror stories of homophobia, racism, and grave, grave misogyny in the fabric of student social life. Perhaps it is rumor, perhaps paranoia, perhaps the resentful murmurings of those who do not fit into the cool scene. Whatever.
Last week, I saw a series of pictures from a campus Halloween party thrown by a fraternity. Here, white male students wore black-face and red-face -- playing stereotypes of socially suppressed communities. I hear of a game called Beirut, where students line up to kill Arabs/Muslims with ping-pong balls as a prelude to being bombed by beer.
There are the routine stories of date rape drugs and of sexual harassment, and of derogatory comments toward gays and lesbians. Casual anti-Semitic statements are legion. The sheer confidence, even bravado, of these gestures requires a detailed sociological analysis. But, short of that, here's a thought: it is a truism of social science that on a social field when one entity is organized and others are disorganized, that one entity will bear disproportionate social power over the entire field.
Our campus social life has one set of entities that are organized and powerful. I mean, of course, the fraternities. The co-ed façade aside, the fraternities dominate social life despite the best intentions of the very weak cultural houses and of the new political groups (VOID, The Fred). Given the alumni support, both by check and by pressure on the Trustees, the fraternities operate with impunity. It is this unchecked social power, perhaps, that breeds a cultural arrogance among some of our students. It would be a mistake to see one student or another as the perpetuator of this or that incident. Rather, the social life of our campus is in grave need of social change and collective therapy.
Be the first to comment on this story